The Court of Appeals up-ends well established precedent and holds that a plaintiff need not establish the absence of their own comparative negligence to obtain partial summary judgment
On April 3, 2018, the Court of Appeals addressed whether a plaintiff must establish the absence of their own comparative negligence to obtain partial summary judgment. Both the trial court and appellate court below had denied plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment on the basis that there were triable issues of fact regarding plaintiff’s comparative negligence. The Court of Appeals in considering the issue focused on the plain language of the statute and legislative intent concerning CPLR §§ 3212, 1411 and 1412. In doing so, the Court found that placing the burden on the plaintiff to show an absence of comparative fault would be inconsistent with the plain language of CPLR 1412. The Court also noted that where a plaintiff is awarded partial summary judgment on defendant’s negligence, it would…